RESUMO
Antecedentes Los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) y fracción de eyección preservada (ICFEp), a diferencia de aquellos con fracción de eyección reducida, son más ancianos, presentan más comorbilidades y no son candidatos a medidas terapéuticas eficaces. Por todo ello presentan un riesgo elevado de ingreso hospitalario y mortalidad. En este estudio se evaluó el beneficio de un modelo asistencial, caracterizado por una atención integral y continuada (programa UMIPIC) en pacientes con ICFEp. Métodos Se analizaron prospectivamente los datos de 2.401 pacientes con ICFEp atendidos en servicios de medicina interna, procedentes del registro RICA. Se dividieron en 2 grupos, uno en seguimiento en el programa UMIPIC (grupo UMIPIC, n: 1.011) y otro atendido de forma convencional (grupo RICA, n: 1.390). Se seleccionaron por emparejamiento (propensity score matching) 753 pacientes en cada grupo y se evaluaron los ingresos y la mortalidad durante 12 meses de seguimiento, tras un episodio de hospitalización por IC. Resultados El grupo UMIPIC, con respecto al RICA, en la cohorte emparejada, tuvo una menor tasa de ingresos por IC (19,2% frente a 36,5% respectivamente; hazard ratio [HR]=0,56; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 0,45-0,68; p<0,001) y de mortalidad (12,6% frente a 28%, respectivamente; HR=0,40; IC 95%: 0,31-0,51; p<0,001). No se observaron diferencias en cuanto a ingresos por causas distintas a la IC. Conclusiones La implementación del programa asistencial UMIPIC a pacientes con ICFEp y elevada comorbilidad, basado en una atención integral y continuada, reduce tanto los ingresos como la mortalidad al año de seguimiento (AU)
Background Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to those with reduced ejection fraction, are older, have more comorbidities, and are not candidates for effective therapeutic measures. Therefore, they are at high risk for hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care program (UMIPIC program) in patients with HFpEF. Methods We prospectively analyzed data on 2,401 patients with HFpEF attended to in internal medicine departments who form part of the RICA registry. They were divided into 2 groups: one was followed-up on in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 1,011) and another received conventional care (RICA group, n: 1,390). A total of 753 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were assessed during 12 months of follow-up after an episode of hospitalization due to HF. Results Compared to the RICA group, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF admissions (19.2% versus 36.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; p<.001) and mortality (12.6% versus 28%, respectively; HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51; p<.001). There were no differences in hospitalizations for non-HF causes. Conclusions Implementation of the UMIPIC program, which is based on comprehensive continuous care, for patients with HFpEF and a high degree of comorbidity reduces both admissions and mortality in the first year of follow-up (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Assistência Integral à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Prognóstico , Hospitalização , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular EsquerdaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to those with reduced ejection fraction, are older, have more comorbidities, and are not candidates for effective therapeutic measures. Therefore, they are at high risk for hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care program (UMIPIC program) in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data on 2401 patients with HFpEF attended to in internal medicine departments who form part of the RICA registry. They were divided into 2 groups: one was followed-up on in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 1011) and another received conventional care (RICA group, n: 1390). A total of 753 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were assessed during 12 months of follow-up after an episode of hospitalization due to HF. RESULTS: Compared to the RICA group, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF admissions (19.2% versus 36.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]â¯=â¯0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; pâ¯<â¯0.001) and mortality (12.6% versus 28%, respectively; HRâ¯=â¯0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51; pâ¯<â¯0.001). There were no differences in hospitalizations for non-HF causes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the UMIPIC program, which is based on comprehensive continuous care, for patients with HFpEF and a high degree of comorbidity reduces both admissions and mortality in the first year of follow-up.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Prognóstico , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular EsquerdaRESUMO
AIM: The heterogeneity of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is high, thusthis entity tends to be grouped into phenotypes to act with precision. Within these groups, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) hold this heterogeneity. Our aim is to describe subgroups of patients with HFpEF and T2DM based on other comorbidities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were recruited from the national registry of heart failure (RCIA). Patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50% without valvular disease and with T2DM were included. A hierarchical agglomerative analysis was performed with Ward's method including the following variables: dyslipidemia, liver disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, cerebrovascular disease, arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), estimation of glomerular filtration and hemoglobin. RESULTS: 1934 patients with ICFEP were included, of which 907 (46.9%) had T2DM with a predominance of women (60.9%) and with a BMI of 31.1 (5.9) Kg / m2. Four groups were obtained, two with high vascular risk (one with arrhythmia and the other without it) with 263 patients the first and 201 the second. A third group had a predominance of COPD (140 patients) and a last group with 303 patients older but with less comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients with ICFEP and T2DM, obesity and female sex predominated. All four groups offered treatment chances to improve their prognosis not only based on the use of new antidiabetic drugs but also on other options that may be a starting point for further research.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported that a higher degree of hemoconcentration in patients admitted for the treatment of acute heart failure (HF) constitutes a favorable prognostic factor in the year following the index episode. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the highest degree of hemoconcentration at 3 months after admission for HF is also a prognostic factor for mortality and/or readmission in the 12 months after admission. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The hemoconcentration group was the upper quartile of the sample distributed according to hemoglobin increase at month 3 after discharge with respect to hemoglobin at the time of admission for HF in a multicenter prospective cohort of 1,659 subjects with HF. RESULTS: The mean follow-up until the first event was 294 days, and a total of 487 deaths and 1,125 readmissions were recorded. The hemoconcentration group had a lower risk of mortality or readmission for any cause (RR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.51-1.09 and RR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.05), although statistical significance was lost after multivariate analysis, while it was retained for other factors with recognized negative impact on the prognosis of patients with HF, such as age and functional class. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of hemoconcentration at 3 months after admission for HF is not prognostic of readmission or death in the subsequent year.
RESUMO
HISTORY AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the differential clinical characteristics according to gender of patients with heart failure in terms of etiology, comorbidity, triggers, treatment, hospital stay and overall mortality at one year. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We employed data from the RICA registry, a multicenter prospective cohort of patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments for heart failure, with a follow-up of one year. We analyzed the differences between the gender in terms of the etiology of the heart disease, comorbidity, triggers, left ventricle ejection fraction, functional state, mental condition, treatment, length of stay and mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 1772 patients (47.2% men) were included. The women were older than the men (p<.001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation and preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (p<.001). The men's medical history had a predominance of myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arteriopathy (p<.001) and anemia (p=.02). In the women, a hypertensive etiology was predominant, followed by valvular. The main triggers were hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Treatment with beta-blockers, ACEIs and/or ARBs did not differ by sex. The women had poorer functional capacity (p<.001), according to the Barthel index. After adjusting for age and other prognostic factors, the mortality at one year was lower among the women (RR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p=.004). CONCLUSIONS: HF in women occurs at a later age and with different comorbidities. The hypertensive and valvular etiology is predominant, with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction, and the age-adjusted mortality is lower than in men.
